Category Archives: Books

Quick review: Defending Constantine

Defending Constantine: The Twilight of an Empire and the Dawn of ChristendomDefending Constantine: The Twilight of an Empire and the Dawn of Christendom by Peter J. Leithart

My rating: 4 of 5 stars

What happened when the Roman world gained a Christian leader?

What events happened to bring this leader, Constantine, to be Augustus of both east and west? What consequences happened for the Roman world? And, perhaps most contentiously, what happened to Christianity as a result of the change? Within a couple of decades, churches went from being persecuted under Diocletian to receiving official support from Constantine.

The answers to these questions have many implications for how we express history, politics, theology and theological politics.

Leithart’s book – to oversimplify – shows that a lot happened! The range of events and implications, however, are so complex that they should not be reduced to cliché summaries (eg. ‘The church fell in the fourth century’).

Each chapter of Defending Constantine is a fascinating essay on a particular angle of the history of events or theological implications of that history. At first, I found it hard to discern where the book was going, overall. Yet it all came together in the wonderful final chapter, ‘Rome Baptized.’ At the start of this chapter, Leithart summarises his conclusions about Constantine the man and emperor. Then the majority of the chapter considers Constantine’s lasting effect on Rome (and on politics). In Leithart’s terms, Constantine desacrificed Rome and baptised Rome.

Through the whole work, a constant sparring partner is John Howard Yoder. Yoder’s theological politics casts a long shadow over much contemporary thinking about society, but I am not able to say how fairly Yoder has been represented. Leithart treats Yoder with great respect: with some deep agreement, but equally with points of profound disagreement. Defending Constantine could serve as a follow-up to study of Christian social ethics or (as in my case) a spur to reading Yoder and others in this field.

It’s also worth nothing that this book has a most useful bibliography of primary and secondary sources.

Conclusion: for its history and for provoking thought on theology and politics, recommended.


 

View all my reviews

Some thoughts after reading the TNIV

Is this your Bible?

image

You left it at church about a year ago. I couldn’t find you. So I started using it. I hope you don’t mind! (You’re right, putting my name sticker on the front now seems a bit rude.)

I did not have a complete TNIV Bible (that’s Today’s New International Version). Consequently, I decided to read through this copy when I did a Genesis-Revelation read over the last year. Since this was for my personal Bible reading, I did not take a set of ‘style notes’ on the text. I knew, however, that the TNIV came – and went – with some controversy.

To chase up the details of the controversy you can do the internet-searchy thing. In very short summary, there was a lot about gender-inclusive language. The controversy was so hot that the TNIV has been dropped. It was to be the replacement/update for the NIV. That place is now taken by the NIV. Yes, that’s confusing: the original NIV is now the NIV 1984, and the NIV 2011 is the NIV.

My impression? I enjoyed reading the TNIV.

It did not feel much different from the NIV-1984. I noticed some changes: plural pronouns (they and their for him and his); brothers and sisters instead of just brothers. In other words, nothing unusual for modern English. If it were still for sale, I’d say the TNIV would be a candidate for personal and group Bible reading. It will help you hear God speak as he always does, by the word.

If there’s a more important reflection it’s on the nature of English in flux. We can see the two broad approaches in the two versions of Mark 8:34 below:

And calling the crowd to him with his disciples, he said to them, “If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me.” (esv)
Then he called the crowd to him along with his disciples and said: “Whoever wants to be my disciple must deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me.” (tniv)

In both cases, it’s clear that Jesus urges denial, the cross, and following. The difference in translation is not about meaning, it’s about reception.

All of us can understand that deny himself applies to any individual, male or female. Yet a modern speaker using singular masculine pronoun thinks either, ‘I am excluding women’ or, ‘I am a woman excluded.’ And that perceived exclusion is rightly a factor in translation (and all communication). It has become preferable to use an ugly phrase so people don’t feel bad. That’s a current reality of English. We can’t blame Bible translators for all of this! (Though I hope we use language’s creativity to come up with better phrases.)

Just to re-state this point: I think language use has a reduced emphasis on clarity, content and meaning; I think language use has an increased emphasis on the feelings and reactions of those who receive the message.

But what a privilege we have to have such easy access to so many useful English Bible translations. It’s time to stop talking about the Bible, but to go and keep listening to it.

 


 

Quick review: pastors in the classics

Pastors in the Classics is a book about books. Specifically it concerns fiction works that include a pastor or minister as a major character. The authors are interested in what kinds of pastors, and what kinds of pastoral experience, are presented.

There are two major sections. Each of these two are, essentially, a list of books with some comment. Part 1 lists only a dozen books, with extended summaries and reflection, and a series of questions for discussion. Part 2 lists a further 58 novels, with quick precis and reflection.

Reading Pastors in the Classics gives a good sense of how Christianity and Christian ministers are perceived and portrayed. There are cultural stereotypes of pastors and preachers: devoted to service; unworldly; hypocritical; weak yet manipulative; drunkards; sex-obsessed; unmotivated; etc. The novels represented here are likely to be the reason these stereotypes persist (not forgetting, of course, that even clichés have basis in truth!).

Don’t read this book if you dislike plot spoilers. The authors state their assumption that we will have read the relevant novel first (I didn’t, and have only read two of the 12 featured works).

The list of works could provide a great basis for a Christian reading group. Even better, for a reading group of people doing ministry (paid or not) in order to reflect on life and ministry today. You could use the discussion questions from Part 1. Or, if you don’t want to read a book about reading books, you could just work through the list at your own pace.

If you are interested in this latter idea, here are the 12 ‘Masterworks of Clerical Literature’: The Canterbury Tales (Geoffrey Chaucer); The Scarlet Letter (Nathaniel Hawthorne); The Warden (Anthony Trollope); Elmer Gantry (Sinclair Lewis); Witch Wood (John Buchan); Murder in the Cathedral (T.S. Eliot); The Diary of a Country Priest (Georges Bernanos); The Power and the Glory (Graham Greene); The Hammer of God (Bo Giertz); Cry, the Beloved Country (Alan Paton); Silence (Shusako Endo); Gilead (Marilynne Robinson).

I read the Kindle edition of Pastors in the Classics.

 


 

Quick review: How Jesus runs the church

How Jesus Runs the ChurchHow Jesus Runs the Church by Guy Prentiss Waters

My rating: 3 of 5 stars

I’m very glad that this book was written. Reading it was helpful to me. And frequently bemusing.

Why glad? Because it’s about what the Bible says concerning church government. There are many wise people who have written about aspects of running church, but fewer recent books directly on the biblical data.

Waters convinced me that ‘Church government is a gift of the risen and reigning Jesus to the church, and perpetually reminds the church that Jesus is on his throne.’ (p.149)

In other words, I was encouraged to look again at elders and deacons, at the nature of church, and other matters like this – all of great importence.

In considering biblical data, I do have one disagreement with Waters. His definition of church, I believe, does disservice to the New Testament. He speaks of the church invisible (all true believers through all time), and visible (all the gathered, on earth). There’s much of use here – but the book seems to ignore the gathering or congregation focus of the New Testament. In my mind, this is a significant misreading of the biblical descriptions of church.

The bemusing parts were all to do with Waters’ Presbyterianism. It’s understandable that a book by a Presbyterian clearly explains the (American) Presbyterian system. Yet I think he overplayed the perfections of this system!

Frequently I was with the author as he argued a biblical point – for example the New Testament pattern of plural eldership. But then read with a chuckle as he proved that this equals Presbyterian government as expressed in (some) North American denominations. The final proof or argument was usually a quotation from a Presbyterian book of order.

I am happy to agree that the Presbyterian system is consistent with biblical precepts, but far from convinced that it is prescribed by the Bible. Here’s a wild guess – is this something to do with the Presbyterian fascination with the regulative principle?

Anyway, this book has plenty of good material. There is most definite great value in a thankful use of church government – that reminder alone was worth reading the whole book.

View all my reviews

 

Quick review: From the Holy Mountain

From the Holy Mountain: A Journey in the Shadow of ByzantiumFrom the Holy Mountain: A Journey in the Shadow of Byzantium by William Dalrymple

My rating: 4 of 5 stars

This is a fascinating travel log. In 1994, the author, William Dalrymple, travelled the arc of the eastern Mediterranean – Greece, Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Egypt – to visit sites significant to Orthodox Christianity.

Dalrymple’s constant companion was John Moschos. Moschos proved to be an inspiration, despite dying the the seventh century. Dalrymple’s journey, with Moschos’ The Spiritual Meadow as a reference, was an attempt to visit many of the places Moschos had journeyed through 1400 years earlier.

This setting provided many avenues for observation and comment: the nature of eastern Christianity; the rise of Islam; the transition from Byzantine to Ottoman rule; the history of Christian orthodoxy and heresy; the policies of the modern state of Israel; the Lebanese civil war; the nature of monasticism; the intifada; etc.

One thing I most appreciated about this book is that Dalrymple did not try to collapse all his reflections into a single and simplified summary. Instead, each place or person spoke with its own character. In each place there was a different mix of history, politics, religion and belief – and Dalrymple refrains from placing it all in the ‘Middle East Blender’ to homogenise them into a smooth weirdness.

As someone who knows next to nothing about Christianity eastern and Orthodox (the capital ‘O’ is important), it was good also to learn a little about this group of denominations. Saying this, however, I was not always convinced by Dalrymple’s account of the history of Christian theology. There are times when he seems to accept the model of ‘many competing Christianities’, in which the New Testament just happened to be victorious. Poor history of theology there, but it’s not a major feature of the book.

From the Holy Mountain raised two substantial concerns for me, regarding eastern Christianity.

Firstly, culturally, there are so many threats to the existence of Christians in these areas. Turkey’s modern history has squeezed them out, sometimes with violence. (Did you know that 1955 saw Europe’s worst race riot since Kristallnacht? It was against the Greeks of Istanbul.) Emigration threatens the existence of Christian communities in Palestine, and also weakens the Coptic Egyptian church. Knowing the current troubles in Syria, Dalrymple’s comments are eerily prescient, ‘Only in Syria had I seen the Christian population looking happy and confident, and even their future looked decidedly uncertain, with most expecting a major backlash as soon as Asad’s repressive minority regime began to crumble.’

Secondly, theologically, I was terribly saddened by the way so many of the Orthodox spoke of knowing God and his blessings – there was no real gospel at all. Saints are called on for magic-like intervention (both now and historically). Self-discipline and extreme renunciation is pictured as the way to deal with sins (both now and historically). And absent is any sense of the complete victory over sin and the devil won by Jesus’ death.

For example, we read the words of a monk who lived suspended in a small cage. Why this pain? ‘Burdened with many sins, and believing in the penalties that are threatened, I have devised this form of life, contriving moderate punishments for the body in order to reduce the mass of those awaited.’ Tragic – when Jesus already declared, ‘It is finished!’

Overall, for me this book provided wonderful insight into Byzantine Christianity and its descendants, as well as making me worried about the future of these people groups.

View all my reviews

 

Quick review: From Exegesis to Exposition

From Exegesis to Exposition: A Practical Guide to Using Biblical HebrewFrom Exegesis to Exposition: A Practical Guide to Using Biblical Hebrew by Robert B. Chisholm Jr.

My rating: 3 of 5 stars

I recommend this book, but I also consider it has serious shortcomings. The title, though not exciting, is clear about its purpose. Chisholm writes to help people use Hebrew in the move From Exegesis to Exposition.

Where it’s strong is the exegesis – using Hebrew.

Where it’s weak is the exposition – writing sermons.

First, the strength. I have a little knowledge of Hebrew, and benefit from the Bible software that aids interaction with the original languages. The great usefulness of From Exegesis to Exposition is building on that basic knowledge. It’s not an introductory text, not the book to use to start learning Hebrew.

If you have some biblical Hebrew, you might be tempted into this book by reading some of the chapter sub-headings: how words work and play, basics of Hebrew syntax, the basic structure of Hebrew narrative and poetry. These are matters I would like to know better – and Chisholm helps me. Along the way, he is always providing examples from the text. These show him as an attentive reader who is careful to let the text itself shape his understanding.

Such care in reading is also exhibited in the eight sermon texts he provides. So, while I have concerns about the sermons, Chisholm’s love for the Hebrew Bible is very clear all the way through his book.

So to the weakness: exposition. From Exegesis to Exposition is less useful from Chapter 8, ‘Putting It All Together.’ He starts with a series of seven steps. (From ‘Step 1: Viewing the Forest’ to ‘Step 7: Viewing the Forest Again.’) Unusually for a book published in the US, these steps are not as well formatted as they could be. But that’s a relatively minor matter.

The most serious issue with the process is the end product – the eight example expositions – are all rather pale and tend towards behaviour improvement. They are not legalism, but their feel is definitely that of spiritual-moral improvement.

The underlying cause is a lack of whole Bible integration. Or, simply, there’s not enough Gospel of Jesus. The Old Testament passages are read as if answering the question, ‘What does this tell me about being a Christian?’ It’s the wrong question! Better is, ‘What does this tell me about Christ?’

Jesus taught that all the scriptures point to him and his ministry (see John 5:39-40, Luke 24:44-47, 2 Corinthians 1:20). Therefore Old Testament exposition, to be a true exposition, must also point to Jesus and his ministry. The Old Testament is for Christians indirectly, because we are in Christ, rather than directly (with the notable exception of Jewish followers of Jesus, of course).

This work needs to be strengthened with a more gospel-centred approach to the pre-Christmas scriptures. Perhaps by reading the work of Graeme Goldsworthy, or something similar.

My final recommendation: read From Exegesis to Exposition to learn how to use Hebrew better, read something else to gain skills in turning that Hebrew understanding into Christian teaching.

View all my reviews

Review: One-to-One Bible Reading

As indicated by the subtitle of the book (a simple guide for every Christian), this work is intended to guide any Christian into reading the Bible with another person. I think it achieves this aim very succesfully.

One-to-One Bible Reading is short: barely 100 (small-sized) pages. Even so, it’s divided into two broad sections and 11 chapters, with two appendices being required to push it over the 100 page mark. It’s an easy read!

The author, David Helm, rightly points out an obvious reality: there’s good reason to read the Bible one-to-one with all kinds of people. It’s good for those not-yet-Christian: God’s word can convert them. It’s good for newer Christians: God’s word can effect on-going transformation. It’s good for established Christians: God’s word equips them for further minsitry. And in all these possibible scenarios, one-to-one reading provides what so many people are crying out for – relationship.

After arguing briefly the benefits of regular one-to-one Bible reading, Helm provides a substantial amount of practical advice and tips. Chapter headings give a feel for the ‘users’ guide’ feel for much of the book: ‘How do I get started?’, ‘What will a typical meeting look like?’, ‘Preparation’, Help with reading different biblical genres’, etc.

It’s all great material, and I am sure it will be immensely helpful to anyone, but particularly those embarking on such Bible reading for the first time. Helm want to show how easy it is to pick up the Bible and read it with someone. How good it is – Christians are probably convinced already. But how easy it is? I suspect that perceived difficulty is a major reason more Christians don’t read the Bible together. Helm even provides two simple fameworks for Bible reading to show that we should not be scared off from starting.

I have two suggestions for improvement. One would make the book shorter, the other would make it longer.

Firstly, shorter. Appendix 2 is a series of pages ready to be copied and full of useful questions for the different types of biblical writing (The Gospels and Acts, Old Testament narrative, and so on). This material is reproduced from Chapter 10, ‘Help with reading different biblical genres’, with formatting added. I can’t see why chapter 10 was not itself formatted as ready-to-copy. It seemed a waste of space.

Secondly, longer. I would like to see an expansion of Chapter 2, ‘Why read one-to-one?’ Chapter 2 is, it appears, the theological and pastoral rationale for one-to-one reading. It checks if the reader is convinced of the value of such a ministry. I would like the chapter to probe a little more boldly. For example, we need to ask if we actually trust the power of God’s word to transform. Or do we, as modern Christians, behave in a way that suggests there are other ‘powers’ that equip God’s people for every good work?

These suggestions are quite minor. I hope you buy and use this book, and that it encourages plenty more people to read the Bible with a friend, who will then read the Bible with a friend, who will …

I received a free review copy of this book (though I had already bought one for myself). Since I had the book, I asked for an e-book – so was surprised to receive a copy in the mail. Maybe the e-book version was not yet released when I asked for a copy, but it now appears to be available. You can buy the physical book here (Australia, SE Asia, Pacific), or here (North & South America, Europe, Africa).

 

Quick review: The Heresy of Orthodoxy

The Heresy of Orthodoxy: How Contemporary Culture's Fascination with Diversity Has Reshaped Our Understanding of Early ChristianityThe Heresy of Orthodoxy: How Contemporary Culture’s Fascination with Diversity Has Reshaped Our Understanding of Early Christianity by Andreas J. Kostenberger

My rating: 5 of 5 stars

A powerful modern message is that Christianity is not what it seems. It’s ‘corrupted’. Or perhaps the apparent consistency of the message of Jesus is a result of oppression of alternate views.

This is a powerful message in a world where all power is to be mistrusted.

It’s a convenient message too, for it provides an easy way to ignore the claim that Jesus who died is now alive and offers forgiveness before he returns as judge of all.

The Heresy of Orthodoxy attacks this modern message. It is a systematic deconstruction of the primary scholarly arguments for primitive Christian pluralism. If you like, this book addresses the academic version of The Da Vinci Code. It’s relentless,dealing with specific arguments point by point. As such, not always stirring in style (and I wish the authors used fewer questions). Yet the content clearly makes its important argument stick. Recommended.

View all my reviews

Quick review: ‘If I we’re God, I’d make myself clearer’

If I Were God, I'd Make Myself Clearer: Searching for Clarity in a World Full of ClaimsIf I Were God, I’d Make Myself Clearer: Searching for Clarity in a World Full of Claims by John Dickson

My rating: 4 of 5 stars

This short book has a clear and limited aim. It’s not to present the essence of Christian faith. Nor to disprove other beliefs.

Instead, its aim is to show that Christianity by nature is open to objective enquiry. Such enquiry is not the whole of Christianity, nor sufficient to make one convert. Yet the openness flows directly from the historical and objective nature of the claims: that the real Jesus really lived, died and rose again.

The book is also good in pointing out the impossibility of all faiths being equally true, a prevalent modern mis-application of ‘tolerance’. (All faiths could be equally untrue, of course.)

I think this book is good as a friendly give-away and conversation-starter. In fact, I can already think of someone who might enjoy reading it. Time to buy a new copy…

View all my reviews

 

Quick review, Cadel Evans, Close to Flying

Cadel Evans: Close to Flying by Cadel Evans
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

I really enjoyed this (four stars), but might not recommend it to you to read (two or three stars). I’m writing a quick review to try and explain why. Maybe it’s to try and understand why!

I like cycling. I ride. I follow the professional sport. In many ways, much broad content of Close to Flying is not so new to me. But what I enjoyed was more of the back story to Cadel’s life, including the earlier mountain-biking years. I could almost have seen him competing at the Sydney Olympics – except that I chose to attend the women’s cross-country MTB rather than the men’s.

Yet, despite personal enjoyment, there are all sorts of problems in the book.

One, which may sound unfair, is that it’s quite out of date now that Evans has won the 2011 Tour de France. The whole tone is of a rider who has come second twice, perhaps missing his best opportunity. Of course, (you might object) what other tone could there be for a book written while the career continues? And that is precisely my point: it’s written mid-career, as seems to be happening for more and more sportspeople. If you take the risk to write early, you have to accept the risk of being dated very quickly.

The content is a touch ponderous and repetitive. OK, I get it that Evans was born in a remote part of the Northern Territory – but the book gives far too many versions of ‘look how far he’s come from Bamyili’. You told us. Move on!

The target audience is hard to discern. At times, very simple cycling ideas are explained. At other times very cycling-specific references are thrown in unexplained. On the same page as cycling cleats receive a paragraph of detail, there’s a throw-away comment about ‘the Festina affair’ – which is not explained until a later chapter.

Along this same line, and as a cycling follower, I could spot gross oversimplifications. The internal team dynamics of Cadel’s pre-BMC teams, and the Australian world championship team in 2009, have had plenty of press comment. Cadel is said to have contributed to this awkwardness. So, is it true? Were the reports malicious? What was going on? It’s unsatisfying to read the equivalent of a brush-off, that the Australian world’s team was simply ‘united’, while suspecting a deeper story.

Most notable to me, though, is the extensive use of first-person quotations from key figures in the book: Cadel, his wife, parents and trainers. I reckon the explanation is that it allows people ‘their own voice’. When it works, it’s brilliant – Chiara’s account of the final of the world championships on 2009 is outstanding. It usually does not work. Just because someone central to the story spoke does not mean their content is relevant, or their words well-crafted. Much of the quotations feels like filler. Do we need to know the names of restaurants people ate at?

So here is a strange review. Quite a panning, because I don’t rate it as a good book. But quite a high rating because the subject and many details are fascinating to me, as a cycling fan.

View all my reviews